<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where are your Scenarios in your domain?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/02/11/where-are-your-scenarios-in-your-domain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/02/11/where-are-your-scenarios-in-your-domain/</link>
	<description>Love what you do - Continue to do it - Be eager to learn more about it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:50:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Wertheim</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/02/11/where-are-your-scenarios-in-your-domain/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Wertheim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=294#comment-118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the positive feedback. I really like to discuss subjects like this but the geeky side of me tend to take over so my blog posts has mostly been more technical. Hopefully I will take some time to more abstract subjects.

As long as the &quot;artifact&quot; that is supposed to mimic the scenario/process in the business is not hidden in the model the actual implementation can be what ever new cool implementation technique Microsoft or X comes up with. The important thing is that developers that are taking the step from being database-oriented must not build there applications as CRUD&#039;s, because then they have shifted the data-centric thinking from the database to the code. Yes, it&#039;s hard, and it&#039;s even harder with teams where everyone are peers; there&#039;s to little use of mentors in our line of business.

//Daniel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the positive feedback. I really like to discuss subjects like this but the geeky side of me tend to take over so my blog posts has mostly been more technical. Hopefully I will take some time to more abstract subjects.</p>
<p>As long as the &#8220;artifact&#8221; that is supposed to mimic the scenario/process in the business is not hidden in the model the actual implementation can be what ever new cool implementation technique Microsoft or X comes up with. The important thing is that developers that are taking the step from being database-oriented must not build there applications as CRUD&#8217;s, because then they have shifted the data-centric thinking from the database to the code. Yes, it&#8217;s hard, and it&#8217;s even harder with teams where everyone are peers; there&#8217;s to little use of mentors in our line of business.</p>
<p>//Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Robbins</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/02/11/where-are-your-scenarios-in-your-domain/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Robbins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=294#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your conclusion that the Domain needs an object that mimics the scenario.  In one sense that could be a Command object named &quot;PlaceOrderCommand&quot;.  

In a new fangled LINQ/Lambda way in C#, maybe this is Func.  In the end you still get an object that you can pass around.

Try as we might, I think many of us still think in terms of databases, as the entry level for building stored procedures, tables, etc. is not as high.  That&#039;s not say that DDD is not possbile, but I think there are a lot of barriers for wide spread adoption.

Really enjoyed your post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your conclusion that the Domain needs an object that mimics the scenario.  In one sense that could be a Command object named &#8220;PlaceOrderCommand&#8221;.  </p>
<p>In a new fangled LINQ/Lambda way in C#, maybe this is Func.  In the end you still get an object that you can pass around.</p>
<p>Try as we might, I think many of us still think in terms of databases, as the entry level for building stored procedures, tables, etc. is not as high.  That&#8217;s not say that DDD is not possbile, but I think there are a lot of barriers for wide spread adoption.</p>
<p>Really enjoyed your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

