<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Wertheim &#187; Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daniel.wertheim.se/category/testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se</link>
	<description>Love what you do - Continue to do it - Be eager to learn more about it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='daniel.wertheim.se' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://daniel.wertheim.se/osd.xml" title="Daniel Wertheim" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://daniel.wertheim.se/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>When will we ever see something like this in MSTest?</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/08/21/when-will-we-ever-see-something-like-this-in-mstest/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/08/21/when-will-we-ever-see-something-like-this-in-mstest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assert.throws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mstest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps I haven&#8217;t looked enough but I really miss Assert.Throws in MSTest. Or does it exist? I&#8217;ve seen more people look for it&#8230;. For me, I just put together something real quick. //Daniel Filed under: Testing Tagged: assert.throws, mstest<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=1203&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/08/21/when-will-we-ever-see-something-like-this-in-mstest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the ExpectedExceptionAttribute sucks!</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/07/20/why-the-expectedexceptionattribute-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/07/20/why-the-expectedexceptionattribute-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExpectedException]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I was reading a book which showed an example of an unit test. And even if it was just there to show unit testing as a concept when doing ASP.Net MVC development, I really think you never, ever, ever, ever, ever&#8230;..(n)&#8230;.ever should use that ugly attribute. Why, well follow along. BTW, the example tests [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=1174&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/07/20/why-the-expectedexceptionattribute-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the unit and integration tests for?</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/03/16/who-is-the-unit-and-integration-tests-for/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/03/16/who-is-the-unit-and-integration-tests-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Project processes etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unit tests and integration tests are for the developers. And not only for the developer working with the item being implemented, but all the developers currently in the team; and all the developers that will join the team in the future. The unit tests and integration tests are not for the customer, they are [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=808&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2011/03/16/who-is-the-unit-and-integration-tests-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip &#8211; When writing custom assertion methods &#8211; Keep your assertion stack trace clean</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/06/01/tip-when-writing-custom-assertion-methods-keep-your-assertion-stack-trace-clean/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/06/01/tip-when-writing-custom-assertion-methods-keep-your-assertion-stack-trace-clean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture, Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assertion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MbUnit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testdriven.Net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have bumped in to a couple of custom assertion methods which lets the assertion stack trace contain the assertion method itself. Hence, if I use, e.g. Testdriven.Net, I might double-click on the wrong line and end up in the assertion method, instead of the test. It&#8217;s really easy to prevent this, just add the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=565&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/06/01/tip-when-writing-custom-assertion-methods-keep-your-assertion-stack-trace-clean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://danielwertheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/customassertionmethods2010-01.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Custom assertion methods</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://danielwertheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/customassertionmethods2010-02.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Custom assertion methods</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://danielwertheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/customassertionmethods2010-03.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Custom assertion methods</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://danielwertheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/customassertionmethods2010-04.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Custom assertion methods</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://danielwertheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/customassertionmethods2010-05.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Custom assertion methods</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moq vs Typemock &#8211; Simple solution to It.Is(expression)</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-simple-solution-to-it-isexpression/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-simple-solution-to-it-isexpression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 18:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typemock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I thought I just add one more post about this subject. Previous posts: Moq vs Typemock – It.IsAny &#38; It.Is Moq vs TypeMock – Simple solution to It.IsAny As I stated I don&#8217;t like the predicate that gives me an object[0], so why not do something about it. With this code I can now [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=490&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-simple-solution-to-it-isexpression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moq vs TypeMock – Simple solution to It.IsAny</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-simple-solution-to-it-isany/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-simple-solution-to-it-isany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 17:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typemock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I just posted this post where I wanted the It.IsAny syntax in Typemock. Without giving any long thought on this I wrote two simple solutions: Solution 1 Solution 2 As I said. Not much thinking in there so I&#8217;m probably missing something. It worked for me. Now I don&#8217;t have to type &#8220;null&#8221; any [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=486&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-simple-solution-to-it-isany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moq vs Typemock &#8211; It.IsAny &amp; It.Is</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-it-isany-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-it-isany-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 14:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Moq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typemock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I kind of like the It.IsAny syntax and It.IsAny(validation expression) syntax of Moq. So now when I&#8217;m in the process of switching to Typemock I really was looking for this kind of API. I have put together some simple samples to show the difference. The difference in the APIs #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Test [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=478&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/05/08/moq-vs-typemock-it-isany-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://danielwertheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/moqvstypemock-20100508.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">MoqVsTypemock-20100508</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typemock &#8211; Beautiful exceptions</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/04/27/typemock-beautiful-exceptions/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/04/27/typemock-beautiful-exceptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typemock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I recently started to use Typemock instead of Moq and I&#8217;m currently getting acquainted with the API. I just found something that I really think shows that they are putting in some effort to the product. It&#8217;s no fancy feature just something that I think every Mocking-framework should provide: &#8220;Informative and guiding exceptions when [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=471&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/04/27/typemock-beautiful-exceptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://danielwertheim.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/informative-guidance.png?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Typemock - Informative guidance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How-to isolate DateTime.Now in your unit tests</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/01/17/how-to-isolate-datetime-now-in-your-unit-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/01/17/how-to-isolate-datetime-now-in-your-unit-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shows one implementation that lets you isolate DateTime.Now when you are writing your unit tests.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=226&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/01/17/how-to-isolate-datetime-now-in-your-unit-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faking API for stubs and mocks</title>
		<link>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/01/16/faking-api-for-stubs-and-mocks/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/01/16/faking-api-for-stubs-and-mocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Wertheim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stubs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wertheim.se/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just for fun I started to build my own API for taking care of stubbing and mocking while writing my tests. It wasn&#8217;t all for fun, since I didn&#8217;t like the API of the Moq-framework (read earlier writings about this) I thought that I could wrap Moq in my own API. Since I&#8217;m not consuming [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=daniel.wertheim.se&amp;blog=9709818&amp;post=221&amp;subd=danielwertheim&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.wertheim.se/2010/01/16/faking-api-for-stubs-and-mocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/274ce0291206c9d27635a865ac48b5c4?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Daniel</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
